 
Balletlover - Balletmania
written by .. at on 25.06. at 21:02:40 - as answer to: Re: You were expecting.....? by Bellatrix Black at >>The arguement isn't tryanny or genocide, the arguement is society being 'narrow minded' for not excepting it. Fetish doesn't represent something negative TO YOU, it might TO OTHERS. the same way a naiz uniform might or might not to others. Why are c0mmunist era regalia, under which far more (some 120 million died) perfectly acceptable? Ever think about THAT? >fetishism is hardly komparable to war. your arguments lack merit. nobody, except maybe those who get off on suffocation, can die as a result of a mere fetish. rubbing my legs on my girlie's legs while we're both in tights is not harmful in the least. in fact, it feels damn good. you should try it. or at least grow a spine. everybody has a fetish of some kind, whether they want to admit it or not. don't bother trying to tell me you don't, because you do. we on this board embrace and glorify ours, and if you don't like it, there's the door. >Bellatrix Black Hmm, here you are c0mplaining about 'narrow mindedness' - seems you want your ow n space AND the right to intrude on others.... again, why is c0mmunist regalia 'acceptable'. Answers to this message: 
|
